Commentary for Bava Kamma 76:16
אמר אביי כדי
a <i>Nethinah</i><span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A Gibeonite, v. Glos. ');"><sup>27</sup></span> or a Cuthean.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Keth. III, 1. ');"><sup>28</sup></span> Now if you maintain that R. Meir imposed a pecuniary disability on them, why then not impose it in this case too,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By not allowing them to recover compensation for seduction. ');"><sup>29</sup></span> so that [Israelites] should not mix with them? Abaye thereupon said:
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 76:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.